if peshawar was here

24 09 2013

The attacks on Christians around the world are a conundrum for our news reporters who need people to fit easily into stereotypes. We can have angry Pakistani muslims (men), or grieving Pakistani muslims (women), but Pakistani Christians talking about forgiveness? Sorry, there are Christians in Pakistan? They don’t look very Christian…

We can have Syrian muslims fighting the bad Syrian government forces, but Syrian Christians fighting for Assad against “the West”? For their own safety? What about Syrian churches being sacked? As one Syrian Christian said, in a BBC report that did include them: “We gave you St Paul, and you give us bombs?” They gave us Paul? Surely he was a white European? They don’t look very Christian…

And then there’s Egypt, another confusing melting-pot of Muslims and Christians who have co-existed for centuries quite happily, and are now being drawn against each other as Islamists attack churches and Christian communities. Why? In all 3 situations, a lot of it is because the indigenous Christians, despite being indigenous and not westerners, are considered guilty-by-association with the West, namely America. 

aftermath of the attacks in Peshawar

How does that make us feel? Does it and should it affect our policies? Now, I realise we shouldn’t just care about minority groups under attack because  they are Christians and ‘we’ are Christians. But we do feel an affinity with others who share our faith in Jesus, and it should bother us. The media find it hard, I think, because stories about Muslims are about an ‘other’ therefore there is less overt bias (except there is), but stories about Christians are about an ‘us’, no matter how secular we think our country is.

So to avoid looking sympathetic, or even interested, in the crazees who still ‘do’ religion in our country, they ignore it; and to avoid challenging their own stereotypes about what Christians look like (white, sensible, dull), they brush over the different ones (Pakistani, Syrian, Egyptian). Which is crazy, as the latter 2 having had Christians longer than our country has existed.

It got me thinking what difference it would make if these things were happening here. More than 80 people were killed – in church, by 2 suicide bombers – in the Peshawar attack in Pakistan That is more than double our entire congregation. What would we do if the church up the road had been decimated by a suicide bombing? Would it make a difference to us? Would it suddenly make going to church an act of political rebellion, or an impossibility? How would it affect you?


This isn’t meant to trivialise it, but to make us think. Christians around the world suffer terribly, sometimes because of the action – or inaction – of us and our governments. Makes you think, doesn’t it. 

FOr more information about persecution of Christians across the world, see Open Doors UK



2 responses

25 09 2013

Very valid point and thought provoking. There is no place for me to vote, I’d say that I don’t attend church regularly, I would be anxious to attend if something like that happened but I don’t go nearly enough for my attendance to be affected. I’d probably resume when I’d made peace with the atrocity, in other words when I was less scared.

25 09 2013

Thanks for your honesty, I think a lot of us would feel the same. If it was dangerous to go, it would make us think differently.

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: